Skip to main content

Public

Project privacy set to public. By default, its content is available to everyone (authenticated or not). Please note that more restrictive permissions might exist on some items.

    •  
      request #6401 PUT /artifacts/:id issue with artifact links
    Actions
    Infos
    #6401
    Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)
    2014-03-07 18:47
    2014-03-06 11:52
    6476
    Details
    PUT /artifacts/:id issue with artifact links
    I update an existing artifact which has a field of type art_link.
    I send this for the art_link field: {"field_id":2341,"links":[123, 125, 126]}, which is accepted by the server (I use to send another structure and received a message telling that an array of int was expected)
    Though the server accepts my update and applies it, it removes all elements from the artifact links.
    API
    6.10
    Empty
    • [ ] enhancement
    • [ ] internal improvement
    Empty
    Stage
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)
    Closed
    Empty
    Attachments
    Artifact links
    Empty
    Empty
    References
    Referencing request #6401

    Artifact Tracker v5

    rel #6234 6.12

    Git commit

    tuleap/tuleap/stable

    Merge commit 'refs/changes/45/2045/1' of ssh://gerrit.tuleap.net:29418/tuleap into tuleap-stable-master 70efda7eb0
    User avatar Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm) , 2014-03-07 18:41
    request #6401: PUT /artifacts/:id issue with artifact links 9667652096
    User avatar Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm) , 2014-03-07 13:20
    request #6401: PUT /artifacts/:id issue with artifact links 8f52f0a1ca
    User avatar Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm) , 2014-03-26 16:18
    Referenced by request #6401

    Other

    gerrit #2045
    Display settings

    Follow-ups

    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2014-03-06 17:11
    What would be great is a standard format to describe all the details of the input format.

    One could call that a kind of Web Service Description Language on which we could agree and implement :p
    User avatar
    Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-03-06 16:33
    You're right, it works if I use this format.
    [{"id":123}, {"id:"456"}, ...]

    Looks like I was just mislead by the error message I got when I first submit a completely wrong data structure.
    You should check this message in the source code to make sure it doesn't happen again ;-)
    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2014-03-06 15:32

    Sounds strange, I just gave it a try and it works with following format:

     {
      "field_id": 3595,
      "label": "Link",
      "links": [
        {
          "id": 480,
          "uri": "artifacts/480"
        },
        {
          "id": 481,
          "uri": "artifacts/481"
        },
        {
          "id": 381,
          "uri": "artifacts/481"
        }
      ]
    }

    Can you try with the latest version (6.11) tagged today ?

     

    • Status changed from New to Waiting for information
    • Assigned to changed from None to Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)