Skip to main content

Tuleap Community Edition development and releases are no longer public. You have until September 30th to download packages and sources in Tuleap project. You can contact the team if you need further assistance.

Public

Project privacy set to public. By default, its content is available to everyone (authenticated or not). Please note that more restrictive permissions might exist on some items.

    •  
      story #21386 dry run REST project creation
    Summary
    Empty
    dry run REST project creation

    I know if there are know incompatibilitites before to go

    Proposal add ?dry_run option to POST /projects

    What should be checked:

    • User is allowed to create
    • Submitted categories selection and if some are required or not
    • Submitted project fields and if some are required or not
    • Shortname is valid
    • Full name is valid
    • Descriptions validity (short & long)

    ⚠️ The current code is not meant to ease the extraction of verification, the refactoring is a bit tricky.

    Limitations & security

    The validation is done in 2 "steps":

    • First we check if the user is allowed to create (permission, nb max project, etc)
    • Then, all other parameters are checked (in other word, it's not possible to assert if shortname is valid if the creator doesn't have the right to create projects).

    Error messages & L10N/I18N

    • In case of errors, error code is 400 and the route returns an array of errors with the language of the REST caller
    • When no errors, error code is 200 and body is empty

    Mandatory clean-up

    Before moving forward, we need to remove the SOAP project creation.

    Empty
    Empty
    Status
    Empty
    Done
    Development
    • [ ] Does it involves User Interface? 
    • [ ] Are there any mockups?
    • [ ] Are permissions checked?
    • [ ] Does it need Javascript development?
    • [ ] Does it need a forge upgrade bucket?
    • [ ] Does it need to execute things in system events?
    • [ ] Does it impact project creation (templates)?
    • [ ] Is it exploratory?
    Empty
    Details
    #21386
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)
    2021-07-20 15:45
    2021-05-20 17:37
    3761

    References
    Referencing story #21386

    Artifact

    rel #20932 12.11
    Display settings

    Follow-ups

    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2021-07-20 15:45
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    • Status changed from On going to Done
    • Category set to
    User avatar
    Thomas Gerbet (tgerbet)2021-07-08 16:59

    Updating the acceptance criteria to drop the mention of the templates in the verification:

    • if a xml_template_name is provided it is always valid since that the only way to provide a valid representation (in the same way that you cannot an integer instead of a string and vice versa)
    • if template_id is used it heavily depends on the permissions the user has, therefore it is done preemptively with the rest of the permission checks
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    User avatar
    Yannis ROSSETTO (rossettoy)2021-06-28 16:52
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    User avatar
    Yannis ROSSETTO (rossettoy)2021-06-28 16:47
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2021-05-21 14:27
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2021-05-21 14:19
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2021-05-21 14:18
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2021-05-21 14:16
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
    User avatar
    Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2021-05-21 14:16
    • Acceptance criteria
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes