Skip to main content

Public

Project privacy set to public. By default, its content is available to everyone (authenticated or not). Please note that more restrictive permissions might exist on some items.

  •  
     
    story #5332 use a token to authenticate against the server
Actions
Summary
RESt consumer
use a token to authenticate against the server
- I don't overuse my password
- I can leverage on RESTler explorer
- I can generate a new API token (true-random, salted, etc)
- There is an expiry date associated to the token
- I can see all open sessions and expire them manually
- SYSTEM_CHECK expires old session

- I can use this token to authenticate (X-Auth-Token HTTP header)
- Restler explorer can use the token too

References:
* http://docs.openstack.org/content/
* http://swaggadocio.com/post/48223179207/why-the-hell-does-your-api-still-use-http-basic-auth

Empty
Empty
Status
Empty
Done
Development
  • [x] Does it involves User Interface? 
  • [ ] Are there any mockups?
  • [x] Are permissions checked?
  • [ ] Does it need Javascript development?
  • [x] Does it need a forge upgrade bucket?
  • [x] Does it need to execute things in system events?
  • [ ] Does it impact project creation (templates)?
  • [x] Is it exploratory?
Empty
Details
#5332
Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)
2013-10-23 15:51
2013-10-10 10:26
3143

References
Artifact links
Referencing story #5332

Artifact Tracker v5

epic #5225 Core RESt API
rel #5214 6.7
Referenced by story #5332

Artifact

art #5391
Display settings

Follow-ups

User avatar
Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2013-10-21 12:21
  • Acceptance criteria
    Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
    Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes
User avatar
dylan bowden (dylan)2013-10-17 09:55
  • Checklist set to Does it involves User Interface? , Are permissions checked?, Does it need a forge upgrade bucket?, Does it need to execute things in system events?, Is it exploratory?
User avatar
Nicolas Terray (nterray)2013-10-10 10:55
  • Acceptance criteria
    Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
    Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes