Emilio Palmiero (empa)2014-05-15 21:27 Agreed. Let's go ahead with the copy "without workflow enforcement" option.
Hugo KELFANI (hkelf)2014-05-15 15:40Attachments IMG_20140515_094433344.jpg, IMG_20140515_094439577.jpg addedBy Hugo KELFANI (hkelf)(733 kB)IMG_20140515_094433344.jpgSequence_diagram_1By Hugo KELFANI (hkelf)(674 kB)IMG_20140515_094439577.jpgSequence_diagram_2
Tracker Workflow Manager (forge__tracker_workflow_manager)2014-05-15 08:09 Automatic change triggered by an update of art #6874.Current artifact children satisfy the following condition(s):at least one Tasks Status equals On going Status changed from Ready (stalled) to On going
Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2014-05-14 16:33 Patricia, Emilio After deeper analysis of the story, we think that doing a raw copy of the artifact snapshot sounds more natural than enforcing permission and workflow. Example 1: I copy an artifact with a field that I cannot see (permissions) - With workflow enforcement: the copied artifact will not have the field value - Without workflow enforcement: the field value is silently copied (ie. I don't even know it's copied) Example 2: I copy an artifact whose fields doesn't respect global state "Due date > Start date" (was created before the creation of the rule) - With workflow enforcement: I cannot copy the artifact without modifications - Without workflow enforcement: I can create the artifact with "bad" values We are considering going "without workflow enforcement" for copy, what do you think ? Manuel
Manuel Vacelet (vaceletm)2014-05-13 11:04CC list set to Patricia Carrasco (pcar), Emilio Palmiero (empa)