Skip to main content

Public

Project privacy set to public. By default, its content is available to everyone (authenticated or not). Please note that more restrictive permissions might exist on some items.

    •  
      request #12600 Referencing a SVN commit from an artifact does not seem to work
    Actions
    Infos
    #12600
    Jean Porcherot (jpo38)
    2019-01-29 15:15
    2018-12-07 11:19
    13304
    Details
    Referencing a SVN commit from an artifact does not seem to work
    According to this doc:
    https://documentation-tuleap.readthedocs.io/fr/latest/user-guide/svn.html#references-croisees-entre-artefacts-et-commits-subversion

    I commented an artifact with text "Fixed in rev #123" but this is not transformed as a link to SVN's revision 123 of my project.

    By the way, if this is supposed to work, how would it work if the projet has many SVN repositories?

    Empty
    Empty
    Empty
    • [ ] enhancement
    • [ ] internal improvement
    Empty
    Stage
    Empty
    Reopen
    Empty
    Attachments
    Artifact links
    Empty
    Empty
    References
    References list is empty
    Display settings

    Follow-ups

    User avatar
    Thomas Gerbet (tgerbet)2019-01-29 15:15
    This should not be closed. Documentation should be updated to explicitly mention that and the reference should be visible in the list of reference patterns in the project administrations.
    • Status changed from Closed to Reopen
    • Close date cleared
    User avatar
    Jean Porcherot (jpo38)2018-12-11 10:44
    Thanks Thomas,

    I tested "svn #test_depot:1" but it does not work while my SVN repository name is test_depot and it has a commit rev1...
    User avatar
    Thomas Gerbet (tgerbet)2018-12-11 10:27
    Hi,

    The documentation is lacking is this area (especially in french) but references in the format rev #123 were used by the SVN module embedded in the Tuleap core.

    You can reference a commit done in a repository of the SVN plugin this way: svn #reponame:123
    User avatar
    Jean Porcherot (jpo38)2018-12-07 11:20
    • Original Submission
      Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded
      Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes