Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-10-10 13:17 Thank you guys, I'll check on my side. As I understand it, reverting this change has a limited impact, since the problem solved only arised for artifacts created in a wrong way? In anycase, thank you very much for the effort put in all this.
Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-10-10 10:55 Hi Nicolas, Have you been able to reproduce this problem? I've attached my project configuration to this ticket in the hope it helps. Attachments agile_dashboard_template_3lvl.xml added
Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-10-09 16:19 >> Yes, I can add a follow-up comment to mielstone artifact 329 through the web UI >In your changeset, do you see any changes other than your comment? >And now that you modified it, do you see any difference in REST calls? 1) In the changesets attached to artifact 329, there is nothing else thatn the comments I've added. Especially, no field value is set. 2) Even after adding a follow-up comment to artifact 329, I still can't successfully assign an Epic to this milestone. >> What I meant in my previous comment was this : I am able to assign the Epic to milestone 329 through the web UI, even though it does not work through the REST API >Yes I do have the same behavior. The only difference on my side is that it works pretty fine through REST when the milestone is considered valid. Don't know what to answer. I believe you, but I can't have it to work here. I'm using a project configuration with 3 levels, the one provided by Patricia.
Nicolas Terray (nterray)2014-10-09 15:34 > Yes, I can add a follow-up comment to mielstone artifact 329 through the web UI In your changeset, do you see any changes other than your comment? And now that you modified it, do you see any difference in REST calls? > What I meant in my previous comment was this : I am able to assign the Epic to milestone 329 through the web UI, even though it does not work through the REST API Yes I do have the same behavior. The only difference on my side is that it works pretty fine through REST when the milestone is considered valid.
Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-10-09 15:23 Hi Nicolas, sorry for being not accurate enough. - Yes, I can add a follow-up comment to mielstone artifact 329 through the web UI - What I meant in my previous comment was this : I am able to assign the Epic to milestone 329 through the web UI, even though it does not work through the REST API Hope this helps, Laurent
Nicolas Terray (nterray)2014-10-09 15:16 last edited by: Nicolas Terray (nterray) 2014-10-09 15:16 Are you able to add a follow-up comment in the milestone artifact 329 through the web ui ? > Plus, I'm able to what the API refuses via the web site. Sorry I do not understand.
Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-10-09 15:01 In fact, this problem appears on all the PUT /milestones/* routes, since I guess the same checks are performed everywhere. Plus, I'm able to what the API refuses via the web site.
Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-10-09 14:44 Ah ok. I understand the solution you adopted, but in my case it looks like the milestone in which I try to plan items is valid. It has very few fields, and there are all filled in. Is there a way to know more precisely why Tuleap considers my sub-milestone is not valid? I don't see any message in the logs.
Nicolas Terray (nterray)2014-10-09 14:28 Hi Laurent, This has been introduced with the fix of request #7474: Error 500 when updating an artifact without status. Starting from this fix, it is not anymore possible to plan items in a milestone that has a required field which is not filled.
Laurent Delaigue (ldelaigue)2014-10-09 12:02Original Submission Show diff Switch to markup diff Something went wrong, the follow up content couldn't be loaded Only formatting have been changed, you should switch to markup to see the changes Reported in version changed from 7.5 to development